Ah well, �tester� is a funny, fluid title, isn�t it? Of course I have no idea who bestowed it, and whether it is accepted by the so entitled. Be that as it may, he must have been well aware � and not minded � how it would look and, more to the point, how it would be used. A test, if such is needed (why?) before the rubber stamp is applied, could have been done on a far less prominent occasion. Does anyone doubt for a moment that this new product will be sanctioned? Of course it will; there are clearly influential enough interests behind it.
Don�t get me wrong: I fully support approval because I am in favour of a free market.
But to think I was close to getting involved, upon the urging of others outside the Aixro owner community (no-one within it has expressed particular keenness), in drafting a submission for said reviewer�s consideration! I�m now glad I didn�t. Pleading to this association for fairness would be a futile pursuit. Besides, while some benefits of membership cannot be denied, if more members are not wanted that�s no problem either.
Do you think he would �test� an Aixro? It�s been around a good deal longer. But then how might that look? However, we�d even promise to keep quiet about it!
Phew, that�s nearly 400 and more than enough already from an outsider talking out of his backside.
|
|