First, I agree that that is what it appears to say, but look slightly more closely.
C215:
Penalty points will be imposed for:
C215.1 Driving: breaches of 1e ? 115 incompatible with general safety or the standard of a reasonably competent driver Q142 leaving the track without signalling Q144 & .2 blocking and crowding Q145 Leaving the track and kerb riding and gaining non-compliant track advantage Q146 Driving in the wrong direction
C215.2 failure tocomply with flag or light signals So the ruling is not to take those relevant regulations out of the rulebook, but merely to stop the compulsory award of points on the licence.
And as other people have pointed out, in too many cases it appears that officials have dodged the bullet either because they knew that the offending driver would take it to appeal and the National court if necessary, or that the penalty was too harsh for what might have been a 'minor' infringement.
Look how many people regard 'kerb riding' as a right, knowing that most CoC's are not going to make a 4 point penalty offence out of it.
But, allow the CoC to decide that a person is deliberately stopping overtaking, is deliberately squeezing competitors off the track, or is not driving like a reasonably competent driver and give an immediate penalty and it is far more likely that the penalty will be given.
As done on various tracks to date, where the warning flag is shown for an offence then a penalty is incurred, or where the driver is brought before the CoC for a warning and a penalty can be given for accumulated warnings, even if it is for different offences. (ie: if you need that many warnings or don't see a flag, you aren't being reasonably competent).
I suspect that this is a direct response to the number of people agreeing with the Green Paper suggestion that CoC's get some degree of arbitrary controls and 'totting up' powers that can be exercised immediately.
|
|