when did i say you have to process all the data?
if you are looking for a hottest temperature are you saying you would "properly" analyse data before start up of an engine?
or if you were looking for acceleration performance, would you look at data obtained during closed throttle?
or if you were looking at change in shape of a component, would you want every nodal deflection of an fe model when every 10th would be sufficient?
its always good to have the data you dont process for further detailed analysis if required
excel is adequate for a lot of engineering analysis
horses for courses..
the aim is not to analyse all the data, the aim is to analyse what you need at the time and this may flag up that you need to analyse some more of the data, hence, it is always better to have more data than less. obviously there is a cost penalty but thats another issue.
no news on the evidence then?
maybe i should stop asking as it seems to make you call me names and do lots of capitals?
|
|