Although you can write almost anything you want in a contract, or a set of rules, if it is unlawful it will not apply, regardless of whether someone has agreed to it. You can't do whatever you want to people just because they agree to it. If the rule is unlawful, then any punishment, such as revoking your licence, would also be unlawful.
As for MSA verses non-MSA. Governing bodies are generally set up to fix a perceived or actual problem. Whether democratic or dictatorial they usually achieve their original aim. From that point on they start to fail. We have so much historical evidence of this, that we can show huge probability that the MSA will fail. Because they fail in such a similar way, we can also hypothesise with some probability of why they fail. What is left after its demise is harder to predict because it depends on how much damage the government has caused before the people realise it is doing more harm than good, and on how they decide to fix the problem.
|
|