Did someone mention anything about software? I know I didn't.
It's an interesting point though, do you rely on correlation or dependence when it comes to evaluating the statistics?
Is the software inaccurate because the jets used to design it we're unmeasured, or was it designed using purely theory?
If the jets are inaccurate, does that negate the software calculations?
Do you get hit with a double whammy because not only was the software setup with inaccurate jets, but the jets that are subsequently used are inaccurate anyway? "It's a flow rate but we can't tell you what that flow rate is".
How do you find a true 158 jet when Dellorto are so cagey about how 158 is arrived at.
As Bob Dylan said, "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows".
Don't lay the blame on Dellorto though.
As I proved to myself, mostly the blame lies with the owner of the jets.
|
|