To all the people anti RPM - I've said before, why would any well run business not seize an opportunity that stands to benefit them? What is 'wrong' with that? It won't suit everyone, nothing ever does, but isn't that life? If you like the idea, join in. If you don't, don't.
I also get the impression that lots think the existing situation with GX160s was fine. Surely the dwindling numbers are testament to the fact it wasn't? Buy back was mooted as the solution but it didn't happen - why was that? GX200s may cause some fragmentation, but fragmentation of what exactly?
Brian - I'll take you seriously when you make relevant comment. Is there any need for your response to Ben at the top of the thread? Ben is the lifeblood of this sport - young, talented and committed. It's people like him who will secure it's future and the recipe is obviously right for him. For you to basically take the p!ss out of his post is a shame, isn't it? He just wants to race in big grids. Hasn't got a scrap of vested interest in RPM. What's his crime? Should he be shot down for trying to drum up some interest? Will you answer this time? Go on, I dare you.
|
|