Graeme, what a refreshing post in this saga �� now we�re talking. Leaving the timing tool out of it for a minute �
�I would wholeheartedly support a de-tuned gx160 and make all the outputs equal but that isn't going to happen�
Totally agree � but this GX200 thing is suggesting just that � yet it seems to be thought feasible by some. I don�t, and would say the same as you do above.
�a split or fragmented prokart class� ��. Is what�s exactly on the cards here. To reverse that, by definition, it has to be a one engine formula. So, 160 or 200, we would back to where we are after a pointless journey.
�for the class to survive and grow again� ��.. I would suggest for that to happen, we should be very careful what we do now, or it�s possible that the �remedy� may kill the patient.
I know that this isn�t shiny and new, and it�s �boring�, but Graeme, or anybody, please tell me what is wrong with a one-class, one engined (160), buy-back formula ��. with a degree (lol) of help from the timing tool. Goodbye SPs.
Is that really any more of a punt that what�s (almost) happened.
There�s still time to stop this. EPEC may suffer a bit, but in the long run it�s the right thing to do. RPM won�t like it, but he who lives by the sword �.. If people want to go and play with something different then fine. Do something different, don�t play fast and loose with this.
With the underpinning of it�s present stability, it�ll survive.
IMO
|
|