Of course there's nothing wrong with a company making a commercial decision to make money. Of course there's nothing wrong with competitors wishing to plough their own furrow. Of course nobody's forcing anybody to do anything that they don't want to do. Of course there won't be SP200s ....... under these 'regs' anyway.
This is all just noise, and misses the point in the context of it being touted as the future-for-the-sport-as-a-whole, and as in previous threads, nobody has made a convincing case for that. (One posting here even manages to be rude, patronising and contradictory all at once - good effort.)
Of course, if this is what you want to do - off you go - but the fact is that this issue is by definition divisive mechanically/technically (which flies in the face of the prokart historical ethos), and will inevitably lead to geographical splits - hardly what I would call a good plan for the sport as-a-whole, and a long way from justifying it as such.
It would be very instructive for one and all if we actually had some - A. Facts, not biased and confused hubris, B. Race organisers' thoughts.
|
|