Don't any of you guys WORRY about that sort of statement:-
" All the proof I need is..... blah blah"
Just becasue it's what YOU call proof, doesn't have to convince US ...... simply becasue it's ONLY ONE PIECE of the EVIDENCE!
When Alain did it to Ayrton and (one year later) Ayrton did it BACK to Alain..... there was an EXCELLENT reason for them to DELIBERATELY take each other out at a risk to their OWN car! With BOTH of them crashing, then the PERPETRATOR became the CHAMPION.
However, how the HELL would Massa improve his chances of winning the championship if he took BOTH of them off??? A DELIBEARTE 'attack' like that would very likely damage BOTH cars beyond finishing! Felipe had SEEN what Lewis had done on the first corner and he would have been being TOLD that it was likely that Lewis would be penalised in some ways! Damn it! Massa is NO fool and he KNEW the McLaren would be PUNISHED as it had 'delayed' a FIAt..... which Bourdais NOW knows is T*H*E B*I*G*G*E*S*T crime in F1 today!
Think it THROUGH! If 'wheels pointing at the other driver' DID constitute 'PROOF', then there is NO QUESTION that Lewis' FIRST corner was a DELIBERATE attempt to RAM Kimi! Why? Simple........because HIS WHEELS WERE POINTING AT KIMI!
The fact that Massa's wheel pointed AT the track which happened to contain Lewis is NOT P*R*O*O*F that it was DELIBERATE...... well, not for many of us!
Ian
|
|