Itpro you seem to be arguing against a point that chris has consistently said cannot be determined.
He states that Massa is at fault within the rules as he understands them, its how I understand them aswell. He goes on to say that it may be deliberate or it may be a mistake.
Most of the time i like to see your opinions as they are often valid and informative. Here all i can see is that you are reading Chris' posts selectively. Your saying the video can't prove a deliberate act on Massa's part (True) and chris is saying that while you can't prove a deliberate act on Massa's part he has broken the rules as regards no contact (Also true)
Why not read other peoples' posts word for word and if there is any ambiguity within them ask for their meaning, otherwise you begin to come across as petulant.
|
|