UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Hi Bod!
Posted by 'itpro' on 26 Oct 2009 @ 21:56


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
Nice of you to join in.

Thank you for your kind advice; it's the first time that ANYONE has ever said that in reply to any of my messages... however many there have been of them.

In a one word response to your question: Emphasis!

In a more �complete� manner:

If my replies were emails or other types of 'WP' documents, I could underline, embolden, change font or even change the colour of the font. Please can you advise me how to 'emphasise' the words that I require WITHOUT those functions?

You see, I just have a suspicion that YOU use various means of 'emphasis'.... or do YOU avoid the use of the Exclamation mark... or the 'ellipses' (of which you will notice I am quite fond) or would you also count the use of THOSE as� and I quote: �very CONDESCENDING?' Surely, intelligent people like you and me can get the meaning of a sentence WITHOUT the condescending use of an exclamation mark? Many English scholars will tell you the use of the exclamation mark is merely a way of saying: �Oooh, look, I want you to notice that I just made a clever statement!�.

If using THOSE types of 'emphasiser' (if there is such a word) is acceptable to you, you can't object to the CONCEPT of emphasis in text. So... can you give me a clue of how to do it WITHOUT CAPITALS on THIS web site???

Oh... and I loved the sarcasm of creating that admonition of my writing style by copying it... no one has ever done THAT, either!

Hold on� wouldn�t �sarcasm� also be an �unacceptable method of emphasis�, too? And you didn�t mind using THAT, did you?

Genuinely, kind regards.

Ian

Message Thread:

question time  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 1:18)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 2:33)
PR may be flawed but  by 'bt3962'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 6:01)
Re: PR may be flawed but  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:17)
Re: question time  by 'IainB'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:18)
Re: question time  by 'PhilD'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:21)
Re: question time  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:25)
Re: question time  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:44)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:05)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:18)
Re: question time  by 'SimonS'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:37)
Re: question time  by 'Chickenbone'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:16)
Re: question time  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:40)
i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'cosgrove78'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:57)
Cosgrove  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:10)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:12)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:50)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:55)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:05)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:11)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:19)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:30)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:39)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:47)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 10:09)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:17)
It was question time, but where were the....  by 'alanrr'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:02)
Re: It was question time, but where were the....  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:25)
Re: question time  by 'Ldriver'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:51)
Simon,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:03)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:19)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:34)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:01)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:15)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:32)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:53)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:35)
Re: Roadrat  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 13:28)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 9:51)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:04)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:24)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:27)
The BNP vote will probably go through the roof....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 15:07)
Re: The BNP vote will probably go through the roof  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 17:37)
Ian.  by 'alanrr'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: Ian.  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:45)
RoadRat  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 23:30)
A dangerous future?  by 'Kartingdad'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 2:23)
Karting Dad  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 13:46)
Why shout?  by 'Bod'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 20:00)
Re: Why shout?  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 21:15)
Hi Bod!  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:12)
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:13)
a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Chads'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 2:28)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 18:17)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 23:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 0:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 10:48)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Hi Bod!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. [email protected]