I quoted REAL figures..... if you can GET insurance for my mythical 17 year old or Rich's REAL problems for �1500, then the problem is SOLVED.....
Secondly, I don't get the CONCEPT of your objection if it is for �3 reduction as you quote!
Basically, when it's worth doing, the costs go off-the-clock!
Don't trust MY figures. Go and enter a mythical 17.5 year old, in a site of YOUR choosing, who passed his test today and lives where-ever YOU do and drives the CHEAPEST car to insure ( I tried using an Aixam 400cc car and the osts were WORSE!) and come back to us with the BEST set of figures you can get..... and we'll use those!
Then enter the figures that YOU fancy (e.g., �1000 pa for non-accident drivers) and allow as FEW cr*p drivers out of 10 (i.e., from 1 to 5) as you like and come back and DO THE FIGURES!
But you S*T*I*L*L won't address the reality! You are COMPLETELY at liberty to offer insurance on that basis. Just go and DO it! If you are SURE you can make a profit, then you are BONKERS not doing so.....
However, we BOTH know that you can't.... and that NOBODY can..... hence Quinns went BROKE...... and they were NOT talking about a �3 reduction!
Ian
|
|