Like the others, you just don't GET it do you....
Look.... the speed cameras ONLY enforce the SPEED LIMIT..... so.... by asking fo the removal of 'improperly situated' cameras you can ONLY mean the removal of the SPEED limit in those locations..... That would imply that you DON'T think the speed limit APPLIES where it is "at the top of crawler lanes after you just overtook a artic " or " at the bottom of a hill".
I am asking you to THINK about what you are saying as you clearly are NOT! If you DON'T think that speeds 'at the bottom of a hill' don't need to be enforced, then you are saying thyat there should NOT be THAT speed limit in THAT location....
(why is this SO hard for people tlike you to COMPREHEND!!!!?????)
It's like saying..... 'Burglar Alarms are OK near schools but shouldn't be ALLOWED at the bottoms of hills......'.
It's simple, the law IS the LAW no matter whether you (and others) find it HARDER to obey where you need to WORK at it! The ability top slow your car DOWN on down-hill-runs is part of the MINIMUM REQUIREMENT OF BEING ABLE TO D*R*I*VE!
Just SHOW me that you are managing to UNDERSTAND this stuff! Try to get it into your HEAD...... some schools ARE at the BOTTOM OF HILLS!!!! What would you BIZARRELY mixed views do about THOSE speed limits?
The CAMERAS are not what sets the speed limit..... they only ENFORCE a speed limit....
god..... give me STRENGTH.....!
******
For precision, the 'Tories' have stated that they are considering FAR more (stupid) and sweeping changes than YOU are suggesting. They have a 'paper' which suggests the removal of ALL cameras........
Ian
|
|