1) I am naturally a Tory. 2) BUT..... I do NOT think they are RIGHT about everything on ALL occasions! 3) You seem to have the idea that if the TORIES say 'xyz' it MUST be R*I*G*H*T! I'll get David to call you for your membership fee......
Please read what I have written before..... I think they are WRONG and have been trying to pressurise them to CHANGE this view. However, they don't take notice of ME (staggeringly....)
*************
Having (I suspect) managed to RAM the point into your conciousness about speeding at the 'bottom of hills'.... I still remain at a LOSS about what you write. How the F*** can a SPEED LIMIT (not a CAMERA!!!) at the end of a Crawler Lane be WRONG? What about if that Crawler lane finishes BESIDE A SCHOOL???????
What is WRONG with you, man???!!!
The CAMERAS are there to enforce the SPEED LIMIT..... it is thus F*CKING I*M*P*O*S*S*I*B*L*E for a camera to be in the WRONG PLACE if it is set to catch those EXCEEDING the LIMIT in-force at the time/place! The LIMIT is the LAW.... the camera is NOT the LAW! The Camera merely enforces the existing LIMIT. Thus, what you are ACTUALLY saying is that there should be NO speed limit at the end of crawler lanes..... SAY WHAT YOU MEAN!!!!!!
Now....... either explain to me how that concept its WRONG (cameras CANNOT be in the 'wrong' place if they are set to the prevailing limit; it's only the SPEED LIMIT that CAN be 'wrong'!!!!)..... or STOP making these LUDICROUS statements about cameras being in the WRONG places!
Just TELL me how it is POSSIBLE for a corectly set camera to BE in the 'WRONG PLACE'!!!!!
For god sake, learn to think about the CONCEPTS behind your arguments!
Ian
|
|