Nice Try.... but exactly as expected.... you CAN'T answer the question.
Quote: "i never said we shouldnt respect peoples wishes to watch"
Err... No one EVER suggested you SHOULDN'T. Can you show me WHERE I suggested that you'd said that...?
Of course you can't...
Because that WASN'T the question... the one you CAN'T answer... (and thus are trying to avoid at ALL costs!)
The question was... if YOU think we should respect the views of those who want to watch Bull Fighting... why should we not ALSO respect the views of those who want to watch Dog-Fighting and Bear-Baiting and, of course, those who woulds like to watch Gladiatorial Combat?
Have another go and see if you can answer it at the THIRD time of asking!
Two more points....
1) If you want a simple example of being THRASHED.... you are IN a good example, right NOW! 2) If you used your suggested �intelligence� and your knowledge of our language... you might just be able to work OUT why simple English 'grammar' insists I use a capital letter for the first person subjective pronoun ( "I" ) but do NOT use a capital 'g' for a non-existent god! For an amusing simile: I would NOT capitalise the word 'thoughtful' when describing your, similarly non-existent attributes!
And, if I were you, I wouldn't draw TOO much attention to grammar and spelling... Just LOOK at that quotation of yours that I have appended, above... need I say more?
Ian
|
|