Quote: The only idiots still listening to you are Itpro and myself, doesn`t that tell you something....
It is good that you have finally realised, and admitted, that you are an idiot. This is no great revelation, as it is clear to see from your postings.
For example in this thread you have said: �I`m amazed that so many people have backed his comments up to be honest...� And then: �Nobody supports your 'views', even if they could understand them.� And then: �NO-ONE has come out and supported your "views"� And then: �Except for you and `kudos`......???�
You have gone from amazement of how many, to nobody, to a shouted no-one, to one, in the space of four posts. Perhaps this inconsistency in your own argument is why you have finally admitted to being an idiot.
However the real problem is that you appear to be trying to show weakness in his argument based on the amount of support it has. This has no relevance to the argument, in the same way as who he is has no relevance.
Unlike you I won't speak for others, but I haven't supported Paul�s argument for two reasons. One is he doesn�t need support, because he has a reasoned argument and you only have mindless drivel. And two is because I tire of arguing against mindless drivel from idiots, even self confessed ones.
I see comments like calling someone a 'Paki' is the same as calling someone a 'Brit'. Obviously it is easy to explain why this is untrue, but if you are capable of writing such a thing it seems unlikely that you would be capable of accepting the explanation.
Having said all that I do enjoy your posts. Rightly or wrongly, they amuse me.
For example:
�NO-ONE has come out and supported your "views"� �It has to tell you something......surely, or can you REALLY be that stupid?�
The first line is blatantly untrue. The evidence is right in front of us. Then you suggest he is REALLY stupid based on your ridiculous first line.
It's funnier than most sitcoms, so keep up the good work.
And finally.........what jokes?
|
|