We would only be breaking international law IF:
1) we sent back refugees who originally landed (from their 'home' country) on British soil as being the FIRST 'safe' country into which they arrived. Errrr.... these guys are coming via France.....
2) they show show that they ARE refugees and not just economic migrants.
Please note, Aus is ONLY rejecting those who are NOT classed as refugees. Genuine refugees are (officially....) getting in.
Let's get back to basics: answer this HONESTLY or I am not continuing this:-
Do you think there should EVER be ANY MAXIMUM number of immigrants (legal and illegal) that we allow into the UK?
When you've answered that, we can proceed.
For the avoidance of doubt, I DEFINITELY think we should have a maximum: I am open to discussion on the number.
Ian
|
|