I am not suggesting the migrants would STEAL your goods. I am suggesting that they�d need to USE the (e.g.) goods, services and land, that you take for granted and you would be further impoverished by that �loss of amenity�. That has happened to a minor (but tolerable) extent already. However, the losses caused by unlimited immigration WOULD be intolerable.
You have this silly view that no matter how many migrants arrive, there would always be enough space and services (etc..) This place is NOT the TARDIS, you know!
No Flood? Try looking at that graph again......
We might not be the most populated but you AGAIN misrepresent the figures! Only Malta, Belgium, the Netherlands have a higher population density. Malta is a questionable one in that list but I note, none of them were in your list of comparison countries. So..... if we compare your list, we ARE the most populated of your list. You should also remember that the UK contains Wales and Scotland, both of whom have far lower density than the rest of England. If we just took the population density of England, we�d be 2nd behind Malta!
My Figures? Try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_statistics
I am not denying my position is �selfish� (for the people of this country, really). I was suggesting that your stance is also much more selfish than you�d be willing to admit.
Ian
|
|