UK Karting - Notice Board (Chat) : Re: TT...for Vic Part 2

Notice Board (Chat)

Re: TT...for Vic Part 2
Posted by 'vic' on 14 Jun 2010 @ 15:41

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

vicJoined: December 2001
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

Well, here we go again�you know just what I think, don�t you Ian. Expet that once again, you are wrong. I WOULD disagree on team bosses TELLING a driver to (say) go without a helmet�I would NOT object if the driver himself (or herself?) decided to. They are adults, they know the risk.

�I also have ZERO doubt that you'd object to kart tracks being allowed to return SQUARE KERBS to the tracks, allow unprotected trees and concrete/stone walls to be added, or drivers choosing to race without suitable gloves, boots, seats, floor trays, padded steering wheels.... etc., etc., etc..... Again, the kart drivers would be making an ENTIRELY VOLUNTARY DECISION whether to compete or not.�

You are good at these ZERO DOUBTS, aren�t you? Well, at getting them wrong, anyway! And�.while we are on this subject�you yourself have, on this very forum, argued AGAINST the use of bodywork on karts. Your theory (which may have some validity�or may not) is that people drive safer whitout that �protection� However, the authorities choose to ignore your pleas to keep things as YOU want them. In short, they have followed EXACTLY the line you want to follow now�and you have agued against that.

� However, you feel that it IS the right of people to decide to race on roads that are SO F***ING LETHAL THAT THEY KILL AT LEAST ONE RIDER EVERY DAMNED YEAR!!!!!�

Wrong Ian�the road is perfectly safe�.its the RIDERS who are dangerous.. They are absolutely bonkers�.stark staring, every one of them. Isn�t it marvellous that there are such people? Losing just one is terrible. But people like them are not going to be chained by people like you.

�I know you and there is not a CHANCE IN HELL that you'd tolerate a track which killed a KARTER on EVERY OCCASSION IT IS USED! Do NOT pretend that you ARE that calous!�

Yet again, you demonstrate the supreme skill of incorrectly reading minds!
I can�t see anything wrong in such a track. I doubt that many people would want to use it though�.it might go out of business quite quickly!

Message Thread:

TT...for Ian by 'vic' (12 Jun 2010 @ 21:26)

Re: TT...for Ian by 'jtthedevil' (13 Jun 2010 @ 13:00)

Re: TT...for Ian by 'Smileyman' (13 Jun 2010 @ 16:38)

theres one simple question....... by 'Aquila' (13 Jun 2010 @ 18:14)

Certainty * by 'DavyBoy' (14 Jun 2010 @ 9:39)

Re: Certainty * by 'Newshound' (14 Jun 2010 @ 10:10)

Re: Certainty * by 'Newshound' (14 Jun 2010 @ 11:37)

Re: Certainty * by 'DavyBoy' (14 Jun 2010 @ 12:18)

Re: Certainty * by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 12:59)

Re: Certainty * by 'RotaxTim' (14 Jun 2010 @ 11:30)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 12:51)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'richpudd2003' (14 Jun 2010 @ 13:56)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'DavyBoy' (14 Jun 2010 @ 14:21)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'richpudd2003' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:03)

Re: TT...Rich...... by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:25)

Re: TT...Rich by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:12)

For Goodness Sake.......... by 'Newshound' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:36)

Re: For Goodness Sake.......... by 'richpudd2003' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:41)

Newshound....... by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 17:52)

Disgraceful Ian............ by 'Newshound' (14 Jun 2010 @ 18:03)

Re: Disgraceful Ian............ by 'SteveGraves' (14 Jun 2010 @ 18:10)

Re: TT...Rich by 'richpudd2003' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:38)

Re: TT...Rich by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 18:02)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'PMN' (14 Jun 2010 @ 14:22)

Re: TT...for PNM by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:32)

Re: TT...for Vic Part 1 by 'vic' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:40)

Re: TT...for Vic Part 2 by 'vic' << You are here!

Re: TT...for Vic Part 2 by 'vic' (14 Jun 2010 @ 15:41)

Re: TT...for Vic Part 2 by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 17:49)

Re: TT...for Vic Part 2 by 'itpro' (14 Jun 2010 @ 17:41)

Sad but true by 'DavyBoy' (14 Jun 2010 @ 20:30)

Re: Sad but true by 'Aquila' (14 Jun 2010 @ 20:48)

Re: Sad but true - DavyBoy by 'dm8558' (14 Jun 2010 @ 21:16)

Re: Sad but true by 'DavyBoy' (14 Jun 2010 @ 21:29)

Re: Sad but true by 'Aquila' (14 Jun 2010 @ 21:35)

Re: Sad but true by 'DavyBoy' (14 Jun 2010 @ 21:56)

Re: davy-boy by 'Smileyman' (15 Jun 2010 @ 9:46)

Re: Sad but true by 'Hootsman' (14 Jun 2010 @ 21:55)

Re: TT...for Vic Part 2 by 'davidmc' (14 Jun 2010 @ 22:44)

Re: TT...your reply, Ian by 'vic' (15 Jun 2010 @ 14:27)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'alanrr' (15 Jun 2010 @ 11:48)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'kudos' (17 Jun 2010 @ 20:27)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'vic' (18 Jun 2010 @ 6:18)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'BrianP' (18 Jun 2010 @ 8:33)

Re: TT...for Vic by 'Newshound' (18 Jun 2010 @ 8:41)

Old bold bikers by 'DavyBoy' (18 Jun 2010 @ 10:34)

Re: Old bold bikers by 'BrianP' (18 Jun 2010 @ 11:36)

Re: Old bold bikers by 'Newshound' (18 Jun 2010 @ 11:44)

newshound....will start a new thread by 'kudos' (18 Jun 2010 @ 21:46)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links